Today you have learned about how a mindset on the design themes for exertion games can make a difference between a good game and a very good game.
You have also practiced presenting an elevator pitch, and received feedback from the entire class on your project.
You have also learned that you can easily extend your game to the physical world with Arduinos and the Wiimote, please refer to the groups' members if you have any questions.
Please make sure you check the project presentation page that you know your team's letter and when to present your final project.
Homework
Use today’s feedback in your project
Your project needs a webpage!
Prepare a 5 min presentation of your project
Enter your blog comment
Read presentationzen.com
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Mailinglist for exergames in AU and NZ
Hi,
I've just created a new mailinglist for people interested in exergames in AU and NZ.
To join, send email to
exergames-australia-subscribe@googlegroups.com
Cheers,
Floyd
I've just created a new mailinglist for people interested in exergames in AU and NZ.
To join, send email to
exergames-australia-subscribe@googlegroups.com
Cheers,
Floyd
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Talk invite:
Public free talk:
WOW, they're uncontrollable: Online games, censorship and the
crisis of control.
Speaker: Dr. Jeffrey E. Brand, Associate Dean and Head of School,
Communication and Media, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Bond University
DATE: Wednesday 13 May, 2009
TIME: 6:00 to 7:30 pm
Location: Theatre 3, Alan Gilbert Building, The University of Melbourne
Getting there: The Alan Gilbert Building is on the corner of Grattan St
and Barry St in Carlton. The best approach is to enter the Alan Gilbert
Building from the Barry St entrance. Theatre 3 is on level one. Go up
the stairs that will appear directly in front of you - at the top of the
stairs, walk around to your left and keep walking - a clearly sign-posted
entrance to the theatre will be visible in front of you. Lift access is also available to level one.
Abstract: Computer and video games are big business in Australia, just
as they are in many other developed economies. In 2008, the retail sector
traded AU$1.9 billion in hardware, software and peripherals. Of this
total, approximately AU$15 million were MMORPGs such as World of
Warcraft (WOW). Ongoing online game subscriptions such as WOW may have accounted
for another AU$300 million and games downloaded through services such as
Steam and Direct2Drive are not accounted for in domestic retail figures.
Australia is unique among developed states in that it does not provide
for an R18+ or "Adult" rating for computer game content. Yet demographic,
behavioural and attitudinal data indicate that adults are a core market
for games, are the heaviest consumers of massively multiplayer online
games and are savvy consumers capable of considering the risks of playing
games with challenging and confronting content while acting responsibly
when using such games in homes with children. Recent controversy over
whether games that are exclusively played online must be classified to
be legally sold or exhibited in Australia has added to a growing chorus of
criticism over the Australian content regulation regime. Most
online-only games such as and including WOW have not been submitted by their
publishers for classification by the Classification Board. James Beniger's
(1986) notion of a 'crisis of control' will be used to contextualise the contemporary regulatory environment and its failure to accommodate the rapidly changing medium of computer games. Suggestions and probable scenarios will be offered and canvassed to evaluate the policy and
technical trajectory of ratings and classification in Australia.
Speaker: Jeff Brand is Associate Professor and Head of the School of
Communication and Media at Bond University. His research explores the
effects of electronic media on audiences and the policy imperatives that
arise from presumed effects. He conducts most of his research on
computer game audiences and is author of the Interactive Australia series of
studies for the Interactive Entertainment Association of Australia. Jeff
has published in the Journal of Communication, Journal of Advertising
Research, Educational Leadership, Asia Pacific Media Educator,
Communications & Strategies, Media International Australia and in edited
texts in the field of media. He is co-author (with Prof. Mark Pearson)
of Sources of News and Current Affairs (2001). Jeff has served as a
consultant to the Australian Communications and Media Authority, the
Classification Board, the Special Broadcasting Service, and the
Interactive Entertainment Association of Australia. He completed his PhD
in 1995 at Michigan State University.
This is a public lecture. Entry is free.
Sponsors: IEEE-Society for the Social Implications of Technology and The Department of Information Systems, The University of Melbourne.
WOW, they're uncontrollable: Online games, censorship and the
crisis of control.
Speaker: Dr. Jeffrey E. Brand, Associate Dean and Head of School,
Communication and Media, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Bond University
DATE: Wednesday 13 May, 2009
TIME: 6:00 to 7:30 pm
Location: Theatre 3, Alan Gilbert Building, The University of Melbourne
Getting there: The Alan Gilbert Building is on the corner of Grattan St
and Barry St in Carlton. The best approach is to enter the Alan Gilbert
Building from the Barry St entrance. Theatre 3 is on level one. Go up
the stairs that will appear directly in front of you - at the top of the
stairs, walk around to your left and keep walking - a clearly sign-posted
entrance to the theatre will be visible in front of you. Lift access is also available to level one.
Abstract: Computer and video games are big business in Australia, just
as they are in many other developed economies. In 2008, the retail sector
traded AU$1.9 billion in hardware, software and peripherals. Of this
total, approximately AU$15 million were MMORPGs such as World of
Warcraft (WOW). Ongoing online game subscriptions such as WOW may have accounted
for another AU$300 million and games downloaded through services such as
Steam and Direct2Drive are not accounted for in domestic retail figures.
Australia is unique among developed states in that it does not provide
for an R18+ or "Adult" rating for computer game content. Yet demographic,
behavioural and attitudinal data indicate that adults are a core market
for games, are the heaviest consumers of massively multiplayer online
games and are savvy consumers capable of considering the risks of playing
games with challenging and confronting content while acting responsibly
when using such games in homes with children. Recent controversy over
whether games that are exclusively played online must be classified to
be legally sold or exhibited in Australia has added to a growing chorus of
criticism over the Australian content regulation regime. Most
online-only games such as and including WOW have not been submitted by their
publishers for classification by the Classification Board. James Beniger's
(1986) notion of a 'crisis of control' will be used to contextualise the contemporary regulatory environment and its failure to accommodate the rapidly changing medium of computer games. Suggestions and probable scenarios will be offered and canvassed to evaluate the policy and
technical trajectory of ratings and classification in Australia.
Speaker: Jeff Brand is Associate Professor and Head of the School of
Communication and Media at Bond University. His research explores the
effects of electronic media on audiences and the policy imperatives that
arise from presumed effects. He conducts most of his research on
computer game audiences and is author of the Interactive Australia series of
studies for the Interactive Entertainment Association of Australia. Jeff
has published in the Journal of Communication, Journal of Advertising
Research, Educational Leadership, Asia Pacific Media Educator,
Communications & Strategies, Media International Australia and in edited
texts in the field of media. He is co-author (with Prof. Mark Pearson)
of Sources of News and Current Affairs (2001). Jeff has served as a
consultant to the Australian Communications and Media Authority, the
Classification Board, the Special Broadcasting Service, and the
Interactive Entertainment Association of Australia. He completed his PhD
in 1995 at Michigan State University.
This is a public lecture. Entry is free.
Sponsors: IEEE-Society for the Social Implications of Technology and The Department of Information Systems, The University of Melbourne.
Friday, May 8, 2009
Stelarc at Uni Melb today
World-famous Stelarc from Melbourne is in town and giving a presentation, organized by Melbourne Uni:
http://www.dis.unimelb.edu.au/pdf/Stelarc%20Poster.pdf
If you are interested in the body from an arts perspective, be there today at 3!
(Picture is me comparing my hand-drawn ears to Stelarc's third ear on his arm)
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Class 4: designing exertion games
Today you've learned about the process of designing exertion games, and the themes
(This differentiates you from those clever 14 year-olds: they might also create a great game, but they cannot argue why it is any good, and hence cannot tell their future employees how to make another great game. By understanding why your game is great, you will be able to do it again!)
Homework:
Prepare for "Projects Madness": 1 min presentation + 2 min feedback from class
Use today’s design knowledge in your project
Enter your blog comment (and don't forget to comment on today's presentation styles!)
Homework for Pranee: reply to Ian Bogost
Comment to Michele's comment on the brain-interface:
Think about the theme "mind-body loop" when designing exertion games: what does it mean to design for the mind-body loop? Focusing on the brain alone does not seem to be the best approach with that in mind. (I understand for some it might be the only way to communicate, so there is a space for that). But do you think you can create better games if you would have such an interface?
Further thought: Anton Nijholt (NL) has done experiments where he measured brain activity: he asked people to IMAGINE moving a box: the brain activity in certain parts was X volts. Then he asked the same people to imagine moving a box WHILE moving their hands as if they are moving a box. The brain activity was >X Volts.
The question for us is not WHY?, but WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR YOUR GAME DESIGN?
Can you see that this is what Guitar Hero does? It does not only make you THINK (see imagining moving the box) you are a rockstar by putting up all the graphics & sound etc, it ALSO strengthens these emotions that make you think you are a rockstar by encouraging you to do the associated MOVEMENTS: they give you a guitar, so you stand like a rockstar, but they also reward tilting it upwards in the gameplay (even though it does not add anything the way you play (regular) guitar), making it a much more emotional game (through imagining fantasy play) than if they would have just giving you the buttons and the strum bar.
Comments appreciated on what does this mean for YOUR game.
- social
- emotion
- mind-body loop
- mind body conflict?
- performance
(This differentiates you from those clever 14 year-olds: they might also create a great game, but they cannot argue why it is any good, and hence cannot tell their future employees how to make another great game. By understanding why your game is great, you will be able to do it again!)
Homework:
Prepare for "Projects Madness": 1 min presentation + 2 min feedback from class
Use today’s design knowledge in your project
Enter your blog comment (and don't forget to comment on today's presentation styles!)
Homework for Pranee: reply to Ian Bogost
Comment to Michele's comment on the brain-interface:
Think about the theme "mind-body loop" when designing exertion games: what does it mean to design for the mind-body loop? Focusing on the brain alone does not seem to be the best approach with that in mind. (I understand for some it might be the only way to communicate, so there is a space for that). But do you think you can create better games if you would have such an interface?
Further thought: Anton Nijholt (NL) has done experiments where he measured brain activity: he asked people to IMAGINE moving a box: the brain activity in certain parts was X volts. Then he asked the same people to imagine moving a box WHILE moving their hands as if they are moving a box. The brain activity was >X Volts.
The question for us is not WHY?, but WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR YOUR GAME DESIGN?
Can you see that this is what Guitar Hero does? It does not only make you THINK (see imagining moving the box) you are a rockstar by putting up all the graphics & sound etc, it ALSO strengthens these emotions that make you think you are a rockstar by encouraging you to do the associated MOVEMENTS: they give you a guitar, so you stand like a rockstar, but they also reward tilting it upwards in the gameplay (even though it does not add anything the way you play (regular) guitar), making it a much more emotional game (through imagining fantasy play) than if they would have just giving you the buttons and the strum bar.
Comments appreciated on what does this mean for YOUR game.
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
Social play chapter
Hi,
I've just emailed the reading material: chapter "social play" for the presentation, as this was the only one i could not get online. Here it is again:
http://digital.lib.rmit.edu.au/ereserve/notes09/math2130/31259007731198.pdf
Cheers,
Floyd
I've just emailed the reading material: chapter "social play" for the presentation, as this was the only one i could not get online. Here it is again:
http://digital.lib.rmit.edu.au/ereserve/notes09/math2130/31259007731198.pdf
Cheers,
Floyd
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Tech hacks for the time-rich and entertainment-poor.
I've been following MyToaster on Twitter for a while. It is gratifying to see a domestic appliance so happy in its work.
How happily surprising it was to discover that MyToaster is a neat little hack!
I don't think you could call this a game - it has no rules. But I think it makes life more playful, and encourages new ways of thinking about everyday objects.
Question: will the games of tomorrow be prettier pictures on a bigger screen? Or will more games involve extraordinary uses for ordinary things?
(Games involving the real world include: location based games, more location-based games, an example of a tabletop game, Mr Tetris, Moving Mario, real-world Mario.)
Heatlh Beyond conference: Thursday
If you are interested in health applications for games, there is healthbeyond.org.au at ex-Telstra Dome this Thursday, it's $20, and I am going to see if there is much game development going on in the health industry in AU.
Monday, May 4, 2009
Group 2 - Presentation Summary - "The Wii's Revolution is in the Past"
Group 2
Powerpoint Presentation
Presentation transcript
The Wii’s innovation is not in its interface its in tis simplicity and accessibility be it the dreams of fans or the intentions of developers. The wii’s revolution was not in its attention to “serious” games.
The Wii’s revolution is in the past. In the same way that my father, when he was young played pong and in the way he now plays Wii golf.
Its in the way the wii is perceived and its now autonomic relation to modern gaming.
Another example is the Wii’s Virtual console which takes classic games that were always available but never accessible and makes them attractive to a new unexperienced audience. It’s clear that Wii’s revolution is “accessibility”.
Our assumptions and the way we define “innovation” and immersion although incorrect have not been completely pointless.
The wii motion plus is the next step.
The Wii’s revolution introduced and welcomed accessibility and consumerism , creating a new market for the Wii motionplus, an intuitive new device that absolves most of the problems seasoned gamers have with gesture based controls.
And what about the Wii 2?
Although the wii does not revolutions the way we play it has undeniably created something much more important, a new growing market. Its encapsulated entire demographics sustaining a market open to the next revolution.
The revolution that we incorrectly assumed and impatiently demanded.
The wii2 could increase graphical fidelity and bring its adoring market accessible intuitive controls.
Is the Wii the revolution we thought it was No? Could it be? Yes, it could prove the catalyst for the greatest transformation on any one medium.
To encapsulate my contention: the wii and gesture has strong potential to heighten physicality in games, but it can only be done to its, self deserved extent. To create immersion or meaning via an interface that interface needs to be at a constant level of complexity. Which disagrees directly with the Wii’s design and purpose. (accessibility)
Furthermore to assume and to name an interface an innovation in interactive media is a fairly ignorant claim. A game should not be defined by the system its on or the interface that’s used to enjoy it. A game should be an abstraction of on idea, one that works within the confines of a medium in such a way that the confines disappear. This is immersion. This is good game design in its simplest definition.
Michele & Rhys
P.s If anyone would like to upload there slides in a flash format. First upload here
http://www.slideshare.net/upload
then when it loads (takes about 1min) you can click on the file and copy paste the embedded link (html) into your blog post
Powerpoint Presentation
Mathsandphysics
View more presentations from guest875023.
Presentation transcript
The Wii’s innovation is not in its interface its in tis simplicity and accessibility be it the dreams of fans or the intentions of developers. The wii’s revolution was not in its attention to “serious” games.
The Wii’s revolution is in the past. In the same way that my father, when he was young played pong and in the way he now plays Wii golf.
Its in the way the wii is perceived and its now autonomic relation to modern gaming.
Another example is the Wii’s Virtual console which takes classic games that were always available but never accessible and makes them attractive to a new unexperienced audience. It’s clear that Wii’s revolution is “accessibility”.
Our assumptions and the way we define “innovation” and immersion although incorrect have not been completely pointless.
The wii motion plus is the next step.
The Wii’s revolution introduced and welcomed accessibility and consumerism , creating a new market for the Wii motionplus, an intuitive new device that absolves most of the problems seasoned gamers have with gesture based controls.
And what about the Wii 2?
Although the wii does not revolutions the way we play it has undeniably created something much more important, a new growing market. Its encapsulated entire demographics sustaining a market open to the next revolution.
The revolution that we incorrectly assumed and impatiently demanded.
The wii2 could increase graphical fidelity and bring its adoring market accessible intuitive controls.
Is the Wii the revolution we thought it was No? Could it be? Yes, it could prove the catalyst for the greatest transformation on any one medium.
To encapsulate my contention: the wii and gesture has strong potential to heighten physicality in games, but it can only be done to its, self deserved extent. To create immersion or meaning via an interface that interface needs to be at a constant level of complexity. Which disagrees directly with the Wii’s design and purpose. (accessibility)
Furthermore to assume and to name an interface an innovation in interactive media is a fairly ignorant claim. A game should not be defined by the system its on or the interface that’s used to enjoy it. A game should be an abstraction of on idea, one that works within the confines of a medium in such a way that the confines disappear. This is immersion. This is good game design in its simplest definition.
Michele & Rhys
P.s If anyone would like to upload there slides in a flash format. First upload here
http://www.slideshare.net/upload
then when it loads (takes about 1min) you can click on the file and copy paste the embedded link (html) into your blog post
Sunday, May 3, 2009
Pseudo-intellectual vapidity of the day...
Apparently global warming isn't going too well. That's a pity. I liked Antarctica.
Shame about the global recession too. Having an economy was a good trick to keep all the economists busy, so they wouldn't bother the rest of us. And buying stuff was fun.
And I hear a few people have died of the flu. That's sad. Not quite as sad as the few million people who died of HIV/AIDS, but I hear it could get worse.
Then there's the millions of people who die from hunger, poverty, childbirth, wars, preventable diseases and the rest.
Oh, and I'm single. Tragedy!
So.
With all this misery going on, I'm curious to how can we justify studying a frivolous thing like computer games?
Thoughts?
Saturday, May 2, 2009
HELP!!
Hi everyone,
Tay here,
I still haven't in any team yet
who can team with me?
I'll be very thankful if you do so
drop me a mail or text me if you can team with me
mail : gollyfruit@hotmail.com
phone no: o433240613
thank
have a nice weekends!
Tay here,
I still haven't in any team yet
who can team with me?
I'll be very thankful if you do so
drop me a mail or text me if you can team with me
mail : gollyfruit@hotmail.com
phone no: o433240613
thank
have a nice weekends!
Friday, May 1, 2009
Class 3: Guest lecture
Today you had a guest lecture from Gerard who talked to you about different types of physical games and gave you ideas about how to implement your project ideas. Furthermore, you received feedback on your ideas in order to be able to refine them.
Slides are here.
Please post any comments on the class from 30 Apr 09 in the comments below.
Homework:
Thanks for the 'Magnificent 7' to post the pictures!
We still need a group to present paper 4!!!
Slides are here.
Please post any comments on the class from 30 Apr 09 in the comments below.
Homework:
- Enter your blog comment
- Read the two papers under schedule for next week
- If you are presenting next week, practice timing!
- Watch: Time management
Thanks for the 'Magnificent 7' to post the pictures!
We still need a group to present paper 4!!!
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Friday, April 24, 2009
Dorkbot
Hi,
Just talked to Gerard, who will give next weeks guest lecture, and he will present you with ideas on how you can realize your physical project ideas in a cheap, simple manner by giving lots of examples.
Another source for 'building' games is always dorkbot, the website does not say much, but the mailinglist is great if you are into physical computing:
http://dorkbot.org/dorkbotmelbourne
Cheers,
Floyd
Just talked to Gerard, who will give next weeks guest lecture, and he will present you with ideas on how you can realize your physical project ideas in a cheap, simple manner by giving lots of examples.
Another source for 'building' games is always dorkbot, the website does not say much, but the mailinglist is great if you are into physical computing:
http://dorkbot.org/dorkbotmelbourne
Cheers,
Floyd
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Class 2: Exertion Games
Today you have learned about how physicality plays out when interacting with the Wii, and as you have seen, this is a heated debate! However, as all presenters have pointed out, there is room for improvement, so with your project is your chance to demonstrate how a perfect physical game could look like!
I feel like I did not answer the question on the project properly (sorry!), so I would like to clarify it here:
I would like to see you come up with a physical game. This means NOT a mouse/keyboard/gamepad game. (Simply because you have plenty of opportunities to do them in other classes).
You CAN do a physical (not exertion) games, but you might need to argue that it is physical (see for example a tabletop game). Considering the topic of the class, you should try to make it very physical and utilize exertion: this is your chance to try out something new and challenging, so you should take it!
I hope this is a bit more focused than my previous answer, and I apologize if I have not been clear enough earlier, but I hope it helps you to create something unique for this class.
Please post any comments on the class from 23 Apr 09 in the comments below. In particular comments and praise about the second presentation, as we ran out of time to give much feedback for Michele and Rhys, sorry!
Homework:
To the 2 teams who presented: could you please upload your slides and photographs to the blog please? And your comments could include advice for the upcoming teams on how to prepare for the presentation!
We still need a group to present paper 4!!!
And just in case you have missed the video that was shown during class or want to watch it again:
I feel like I did not answer the question on the project properly (sorry!), so I would like to clarify it here:
I would like to see you come up with a physical game. This means NOT a mouse/keyboard/gamepad game. (Simply because you have plenty of opportunities to do them in other classes).
You CAN do a physical (not exertion) games, but you might need to argue that it is physical (see for example a tabletop game). Considering the topic of the class, you should try to make it very physical and utilize exertion: this is your chance to try out something new and challenging, so you should take it!
I hope this is a bit more focused than my previous answer, and I apologize if I have not been clear enough earlier, but I hope it helps you to create something unique for this class.
Please post any comments on the class from 23 Apr 09 in the comments below. In particular comments and praise about the second presentation, as we ran out of time to give much feedback for Michele and Rhys, sorry!
Homework:
- Agree on an idea for your project, but be prepared to change it!
- Enter your blog comment
- Read the two papers under schedule for week after next
- If you are presenting week after next, practice timing!
- Watch for week after next: Time management
To the 2 teams who presented: could you please upload your slides and photographs to the blog please? And your comments could include advice for the upcoming teams on how to prepare for the presentation!
We still need a group to present paper 4!!!
And just in case you have missed the video that was shown during class or want to watch it again:
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Tracking objects for games
Hi,
If you re thinking of tracking objects for your game, you should see this:
http://trackmate.media.mit.edu/
Cheers,
Floyd
If you re thinking of tracking objects for your game, you should see this:
http://trackmate.media.mit.edu/
Cheers,
Floyd
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
